Neo-Nazi murder trial reveals threat to German democracy
The trial of two neo-Nazis accused of murdering a German regional governor is about to come to an end in Frankfurt. The murder of Walter Lübcke was the country’s first political assassination in decades.
Walter Lübcke sealed his fate by in one moment of moral principle. On October 14, 2015, Lübcke, a regional governor in the city of Kassel, Hesse, was carrying out a public duty that he performed several times that autumn, when Germany was seeing an unprecedented influx of refugees from Syria. He appeared at a townhall meeting in the small town of Lohfelden to explain why a home for the new arrivals was being set up in their community.
Several far-right supporters had appeared among the crowd, and proceeded to heckle the conservative politician, a 65-year-old who had spent most of his life serving the people of Hesse and Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU), and was now a grandfather thinking about retirement.
In response to a stream of derision from among the crowd of several hundred people, Lübcke felt he had to reiterate his support for Germany’s democratic order, the basic political denominator that he felt the country shared: “It’s worth living in this country,” he said. “You have to stand up for values, and anyone who doesn’t stand up for those values can leave this country if he doesn’t agree with it. That is the freedom of every German.”
He was laughed at and booed. The speech spread through Germany’s far-right like wildfire, and made him into a target of their vitriol. Four years later, he was killed.
The suspected killers in the room
Two neo-Nazis were standing together near the back of the hall in Lohfelden – one tall and fair-haired, the other stockier and dark-haired. Stephan E. and Markus H., both in their 40s, had spent decades in and out of various extremist right-wing groups. Stephan E. already had a string of convictions for violent crimes, including bombings and stabbings. And now they were here. Markus H. was filming Lübcke with his phone, and later posted a video clip of the politician’s remarks on the internet later that night – having cut out the disruptive interventions that had led up to it.
On Thursday, those two men will stand up in a Frankfurt court to face Judge Thomas Sagebiel’sverdict for Lübcke’s murder. The state prosecutors believe Stephan E. drove to Lübcke’s house on the evening of June 1, 2019, a night when he knew that a nearby summer festival would mask any noise, waited outside till the politician appeared on his porch alone, and, at about 11:20 p.m., crept up and shot him in the head from close range.
Markus H. is accused of being his accomplice, both practically – by helping Stephan E. to learn to shoot at his gun club – and psychologically, by joining him on far-right rallies and providing moral support. Lacking enough evidence, and to the anger of Lübcke’s family, state prosecutors have not placed Markus H. at the murder scene, though Stephan E. testified that he was there.
Stephan E. will almost certainly be convicted on Thursday: He confessed to the murder on his arrest in June 2019 and during the trial, and his DNA was found on Lübcke’s clothing.
But Markus H.’s role has proved much more difficult to pin down, and some observers think he has a good chance of being acquitted. Nevertheless many, like left-wing politician Hermann Schaus, who is on the Hesse parliamentary committee investigating the murder, believe Markus H. was not only at the scene, but is at least as dangerous as Stephan E. He has been able to escape justice so far only because he is “more cunning” than his former friend, Schaus told DW.
A shock to Germany
The murder was a shock for Germany’s political culture. It was the first time that an elected politician had been assassinated in the country since the days of the far-left Red Army Faction (RAF) in the 1970s and 1980s.
Florian Hartleb, political scientist and author of Lone Wolves, a 2018 book on far-right terrorism, said Lübcke’s murder showed many politicians and security forces, that they had “long been under-estimated” the neo-Nazi threat.
“The security forces, including domestic intelligence, have now increased their personnel, because before they had concentrated more on Islamist extremism,” he told DW.
The case of Stephan E. re-focused attention on a fact that had been overlooked or downplayed for a long time: That there is a network of Nazis in Germany whose members are not satisfied with marching in rallies or beating up an unfortunate person of color after a drunken visit to a rock concert.
Like the National Socialist Underground (NSU) terrorist group, uncovered in 2011, Lübcke’s murder showed that there are neo-Nazis all over the country who are prepared to murder their political opponents and plant bombs. Indeed, it has since emerged that Stephan E. and the NSU shared contacts in Hesse’s far-right scene.
But by then domestic intelligence agencies had stopped keeping a file on him. “Stephan E. was well-known, but because he had started a family and got a job, the security forces stopped following him,” said Hartleb. “Of course that led to questions over whether something had been missed.”
Hartleb also saw new lessons that needed to be learned about the increasing number of threatening hate-emails and social media comments being sent to German politicians. The video clip of Lübcke that Markus H. posted in 2015 was widely shared on social media by rightwing blogs, the anti-immigrant group Pegida, and far-right politicians, and resulted in hundreds of death threats that went undeleted on Facebook and Twitter.
There’s no doubt that going viral turned the governor into a figure who obsessed the far-right. “That’s a problem that we need to address,” said Hartleb. “Now we see politicians get death threats because of coronavirus prevention measures. The debate about how we carry on as an argumentative democracy is a long way from being resolved. In fact, it’s only just started.”